Short Tort Law Essay Assignment

24/7 Homework Help

Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!

Short Tort Law Essay AssignmentORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL NURSING PAPERS ON Short Tort Law Essay Assignment I need an explanation for this Law question to help me study.Please find attached.You are required to solve the assignment in word or excel format. Do check for plagiarism, as a plagiarized solution would attract negative score.Please find below the link of formatting and referencing, as it is very much important so read it carefully and provide us the solution in APA Format.http://www.transtutors.com/tutor-help/referencing-citation-formatting/ Failing to do so will require to submit the solution again with proper formatting.Evaluation will be broadly done on – content accuracy, analysis and presentation, and grammatical correctness. Short Tort Law Essay Assignment tort_law.pdf.Assignment: Mr John Fayaz is a resident of Sydney. The police suspected him of selling guns illegally. At about 4pm on 12 November 2020 while at home with his wife, Constable Jones and 4 fellow police officers approached his house to purportedly execute a Crime Scene Warrant. Once at the door, the officers yelled words to the effect of “open the door; it’s the police, open the door”. Mr Fayaz replied: “what’s going on; What do you want?” Mr Fayaz was reluctant to open the door. The officers persisted in their command for him to open the door. Constable Jones yelled: “if you do not open the door, we will blast our way through and teach you a lesson”. Worried and frightened by the persistent loud commands from the officers, Mrs Fayaz who was 7 months pregnant, opened the door to let the officers in. Once inside the house, officers handed Mr Fayaz an Occupiers Notice (search warrant) and began searching the house. They overturned drawers and emptied several boxes. The family was unable to leave the house and was fearful to object to the actions of the officers. Short Tort Law Essay Assignment.During the execution of the warrant, police seized several of the items belonging to the family. The police also damaged an old Singer sewing machine, a family heirloom given to Mrs Fayaz by her mother from Iran. On seeing the damaged machine, Mrs Fayaz grabbed Constable Jones by the belt near his service revolver yelling at him. Constable Jones responded by hitting her in the face. The force of the blow knocked her to the floor, hitting her head on a kitchen chair as she fell. Mrs Fayaz subsequently suffered a miscarriage and was hospitalized for three weeks. The police did not return the family’s property until April, five months later. The Crime Scene Warrant was challenged in the Supreme Court of NSW and declared invalid. The property seizures and detention during the search were therefore considered unlawful. Advise the Fayaz family..NOTES COVERED: 2. INTENTIONAL TORTS 2.1 Introduction (a) Types of intentional torts (b) Trespass-definition (c) The elements of trespass (d) Specific forms of trespass 2.2 Trespass to the person (a) Battery *Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132 (Links to an external site.) *Uguzcu v Macquarie Hotel Liverpool Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 843 (Links to an external site.) *White v Johnson (2015) 87 NSWLR 779 (Links to an external site.); [2015] NSWCA 18 (Links to an external site.) *Rixon v Start City Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 265 (Links to an external site.) *Collins v Wilcock (Links to an external site.) [1984] 1 WLR 1172 Rozsa v Samuels [1969] SASR 205 Scott v Shepherd 96 Eng. Rep. 525 (K.B. 1773); [1746] (b) Assault *New South Wales v McMaster (2015) 328 ALR 309 (Links to an external site.); [2015] NSWCA 228 (Links to an external site.) *New South Wales v Ibbett [2005] NSWCA 445 (Links to an external site.) Barton v Armstrong [1969] 2 NSWR 451 (Links to an external site.) *Zanker v Vartzokas (Links to an external site.) (1988) 34 Crim R 11 R v Burstow [1998] AC 147; [1997] UKHL 34 Conditional threats *Tuberville v Savage [1669] EWHC KB J25; (1669) 2 Keb 545; 86 ER 684 (Links to an external site.) Police v Greaves [1964] NZLR 295; [1964] NZPoliceLawRp 29 (c) False imprisonment Bird v Jones (1845) 7 QB 742; (1845) 115 ER 668 *Ruddock v Vadarlis (Links to an external site.) (2001) 110 FCR 491; [2001] FCA 1329 *The Balmain New Ferry Co v Robertson (Links to an external site.) (1906) 4 CLR 379; [1906] HCA 83 Symes v Mahon [1922] SASR 447 Merring v Graham White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 Commonwealth v Fernando (2012) 200 FCR 1; 287 ALR 267; [2012] FCAFC 18 Goldie v Commonwealth [No 2] [2004] FCA 156 * South Australia v Lampard-Trevorrow (Links to an external site.) (2010) 106 SASR 331; [2010] SASC 56 Parker v The Chief Constable of Essex Police – Court of Appeal EWCA [2018] Civ 2788 (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)Guo v Commonwealth of Australia [2017] FCA 1355 (Links to an external site.) 2.3 Intentional Torts to Property Trespass to Land (a) Scope of the tort *Bernstein (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd (Links to an external site.) [1978] QB 479 Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co [1957] 2 QB 334 *Bathurst City Council v Saban (Links to an external site.)(1985) 2 NSWLR 704; 55 LGRA 165 Victoria Racing Co. v Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479; [1937] HCA 45 Lincoln Hunt Australia v Willesee (1986) 4 NSWLR 457 Wilson Parking Australia (1992) Pty Ltd v Roads Corporation [2020] VSC 135 (26 March 2020) (Links to an external site.) Cosenza & Anor v Van Dyke & Ors [2019] SASC 761 (Links to an external site.) Woolnough & Anor v Isaac Regional Council [2019] QSC 17 (Links to an external site.) (b) Title to sue Coles-Smith v Smith [1965] Qd R 494 Radich v Smith (Links to an external site.)[1959] HCA 45 (Links to an external site.) (c) Exclusive Possession and Airbnb situations Swan v Uecker [2016] VSC 313 (10 June 2016) (d) The Position of Trespassers versus Squatters *Newington v Windeyer (Links to an external site.) (1985) 3 NSWLR 555; 58 LGRA 289.(e) The trespassory Act Singh v Smithenbecker (1923) 23 SR (NSW) 207 (Links to an external site.); (1923) 40 WN (NSW) 11 (Links to an external site.); [1923] NSWStRp 4 (Links to an external site.) Healing (Sales) v Inglic Electrix (1968) 121 CLR 584; [1968] HCA 60 (f) The position of Police Officers *Halliday v Nevill (Links to an external site.) (1984) 155 CLR 1; [1984] HCA 80 *Plenty v Dillon (Links to an external site.) (1991) 171 CLR 635; [1991] HCA 5 s 99 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) (“LEPRA”) State of New South Wales v. Robinson [2018] NSWCA 231 (Links to an external site.) 2.4 Trespass to goods [B&D Chapter 4] (a) Damage Trespass to goods: elements of the tort Title to sue The issue of damage: Is trespass to goods actionable per se? Everitt v Martin [1953] NZLR 298 (SC) 2.5 Conversion Fouldes v Willoughby [1841] EngR 735; (1841) 8 M & W 540; 151 ER 1153 Willis v British Car Auctions [1978] 1 WLR 438 Howard E Perry v British Railways Board [1980] 1 WLR 1375 *Parker v British Airways Board (Links to an external site.) [1982] QB 1004 Sell Your Gold Pty Ltd v Australian Diamond Trading Corporation Pty Ltd [2018] VSCA 355 (Links to an external site.) Voris v. Lampert, (Cal S Court Case No. S241812), August 15, 2019 (Links to an external site.) 2.6 Detinue General and Finance Facilities v Cooks Cars (Romford) [1963] 1 WLR 644 (a) Damages in Conversion and Detinue Required Reading: [B&D 4.35 – 4.42] The Mediana [1900] AC 113 Butler v The Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board (1966) 114 CLR 185; [1966] HCA 38 The Winkfield [1902] P 42 General and Finance Facilities v Cooks Cars (Romford) [1963] 1 WLR 644 2.7 Defences to intentional torts Required Reading: [B&D Chapter 6.1-6.26] (a) Introduction: The concept of ‘Defence’ (b) Mistake (c) Consent Sibley v Milutinovic (1990) Aust. Torts Reports ¶81-013; [1990] ACTSC 6 Secretary, Dept. of Health and Community Services v JWB (Marion’s Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218; [1992] HCA 15 *Papadimitropoulos v R (Links to an external site.)(1957) 98 CLR 249; [1957] HCA 74 *R v Linekar (Links to an external site.) (the Times, 1994); [1995] QB 250 (d) Consent in sports McNamara v Duncan (1979) 45 FLR 152; 26 ALR 584 Hilton v Wallace (1989) Aust Torts Reports 80-231 Giumelli v Johnston (1991) Aust Torts Reports 81-085 (e) Medical procedures (f) Defence of the person, defence of property *Civil Liability Act 2002 (Links to an external site.), s 52 (Links to an external site.) *Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132 (Links to an external site.) *Fontin v Katapodis (Links to an external site.)(1962) 108 CLR 177; [1962] HCA 63 *New South Wales v McMaster; New South Wales v Karakizos; New South Wales v McMaster [2015] NSWCA 228 (Links to an external site.) Sahade v Bischoff [2015] NSWCA 418 Civil Liability Act 2002, 2002 Part 7 (Links to an external site.) (ss 52-54) (g) Provocation *Fontin v Katapodis (Links to an external site.)(1962) 108 CLR 177; [1962] HCA 63 *Downham v Bellette (1986) Aust Torts Reports 80-038 (h) Necessity *London Borough of Southwark Council v Williams (Links to an external site.) [1971] 1 Ch 734 Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) [2001] Fam 147 Queensland v Nolan [2002] 1 Qd R 454; (2002) 122 A Crim R 517; [2001] QSC 174 Murray v McMurchy [1949] 2 DLR 442 (i) Insanity (j) Infants Smith v Leurs (1945) 70 CLR 256; [1945] HCA 27 Hart v AG of Tasmania (Unreported, Supreme Court of Tasmania, Burbury CJ, 29 May 1959) (k) Illegality/unlawful acts Gollan v Nugent (1988) 166 CLR 18; [1988] HCA 59 *Civil Liability Act 2002 (Links to an external site.), 2002 Part 7, s 54 (Links to an external site.) Bevan v Coolahan [2019] NSWCA 217 .3 Intentional Torts to Property Trespass to Land (a) Scope of the tort *Bernstein (Baron) v Skyviews & General Ltd (Links to an external site.) [1978] QB 479 Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co [1957] 2 QB 334 *Bathurst City Council v Saban (Links to an external site.)(1985) 2 NSWLR 704; 55 LGRA 165 Victoria Racing Co. v Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479; [1937] HCA 45 Lincoln Hunt Australia v Willesee (1986) 4 NSWLR 457 Wilson Parking Australia (1992) Pty Ltd v Roads Corporation [2020] VSC 135 (26 March 2020) (Links to an external site.) Cosenza & Anor v Van Dyke & Ors [2019] SASC 761 (Links to an external site.) Woolnough & Anor v Isaac Regional Council [2019] QSC 17 (Links to an external site.) (b) Title to sue Coles-Smith v Smith [1965] Qd R 494 Radich v Smith (Links to an external site.)[1959] HCA 45 (Links to an external site.) (c) Exclusive Possession and Airbnb situations Swan v Uecker [2016] VSC 313 (10 June 2016) (d) The Position of Trespassers versus Squatters *Newington v Windeyer (Links to an external site.) (1985) 3 NSWLR 555; 58 LGRA 289 (e) The trespassory Act Singh v Smithenbecker (1923) 23 SR (NSW) 207 (Links to an external site.); (1923) 40 WN (NSW) 11 (Links to an external site.); [1923] NSWStRp 4 (Links to an external site.) Healing (Sales) v Inglic Electrix (1968) 121 CLR 584; [1968] HCA 60 (f) The position of Police Officers *Halliday v Nevill (Links to an external site.) (1984) 155 CLR 1; [1984] HCA 80 *Plenty v Dillon (Links to an external site.) (1991) 171 CLR 635; [1991] HCA 5 s 99 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW) (“LEPRA”) State of New South Wales v. Robinson [2018] NSWCA 231 2.4 Trespass to goods [B&D Chapter 4] (a) Damage Trespass to goods: elements of the tort Title to sue The issue of damage: Is trespass to goods actionable per se? Everitt v Martin [1953] NZLR 298 (SC) 2.5 Conversion Required Reading: [B&D 4.3-4.34] Fouldes v Willoughby [1841] EngR 735; (1841) 8 M & W 540; 151 ER 1153 Willis v British Car Auctions [1978] 1 WLR 438 Howard E Perry v British Railways Board [1980] 1 WLR 1375 *Parker v British Airways Board (Links to an external site.) [1982] QB 1004 Sell Your Gold Pty Ltd v Australian Diamond Trading Corporation Pty Ltd [2018] VSCA 355 (Links to an external site.) Voris v. Lampert, (Cal S Court Case No. S241812), August 15, 2019 (Links to an external site.).2.6 Detinue General and Finance Facilities v Cooks Cars (Romford) [1963] 1 WLR 644 (a) Damages in Conversion and Detinue Required Reading: [B&D 4.35 – 4.42] The Mediana [1900] AC 113 Butler v The Egg and Egg Pulp Marketing Board (1966) 114 CLR 185; [1966] HCA 38 The Winkfield [1902] P 42 General and Finance Facilities v Cooks Cars (Romford) [1963] 1 WLR 644 2.7 Defences to intentional torts Required Reading: [B&D Chapter 6.1-6.26] (a) Introduction: The concept of ‘Defence’ (b) Mistake (c) Consent Sibley v Milutinovic (1990) Aust. Torts Reports ¶81-013; [1990] ACTSC 6 Secretary, Dept. of Health and Community Services v JWB (Marion’s Case) (1992) 175 CLR 218; [1992] HCA 15 *Papadimitropoulos v R (Links to an external site.)(1957) 98 CLR 249; [1957] HCA 74 *R v Linekar (Links to an external site.) (the Times, 1994); [1995] QB 250 (d) Consent in sports McNamara v Duncan (1979) 45 FLR 152; 26 ALR 584 Hilton v Wallace (1989) Aust Torts Reports ¶80-231 Giumelli v Johnston (1991) Aust Torts Reports ¶81-085 (e) Medical procedures (f) Defence of the person, defence of property *Civil Liability Act 2002 (Links to an external site.), s 52 (Links to an external site.) *Croucher v Cachia [2016] NSWCA 132 (Links to an external site.) *Fontin v Katapodis (Links to an external site.)(1962) 108 CLR 177; [1962] HCA 63 *New South Wales v McMaster; New South Wales v Karakizos; New South Wales v McMaster [2015] NSWCA 228 (Links to an external site.) Sahade v Bischoff [2015] NSWCA 418 Civil Liability Act 2002, 2002 Part 7 (Links to an external site.) (ss 52-54) (g) Provocation *Fontin v Katapodis (Links to an external site.)(1962) 108 CLR 177; [1962] HCA 63 *Downham v Bellette (1986) Aust Torts Reports ¶80-038 (h) Necessity *London Borough of Southwark Council v Williams (Links to an external site.) [1971] 1 Ch 734 Re A (Children) (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) [2001] Fam 147 Queensland v Nolan [2002] 1 Qd R 454; (2002) 122 A Crim R 517; [2001] QSC 174 Murray v McMurchy [1949] 2 DLR 442 (i) Insanity (j) Infants Smith v Leurs (1945) 70 CLR 256; [1945] HCA 27 Hart v AG of Tasmania (Unreported, Supreme Court of Tasmania, Burbury CJ, 29 May 1959) (k) Illegality/unlawful acts Gollan v Nugent (1988) 166 CLR 18; [1988] HCA 59 *Civil Liability Act 2002 (Links to an external site.), 2002 Part 7, Bevan v Coolahan [2019] NSWCA 217 … Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10 Order NowjQuery(document).ready(function($) { $.post(‘https://nursingpaperessays.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php’, {action: ‘wpt_view_count’, id: ‘9427’});});jQuery(document).ready(function($) { $.post(‘https://nursingpaperessays.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php’, {action: ‘mts_view_count’, id: ‘9427’});});

Hire a competent writer to help you with

Short Tort Law Essay Assignment

troublesome homework