Health Legislation Analysis

24/7 Homework Help

Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!

Health Legislation AnalysisHealth Legislation AnalysisAs a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.To Prepare:Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources. NURS 6050 Walden University Week 4 Health Legislation AnalysisThe Assignment: (1- to 2-page Comparison Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)Part 1: Legislation Comparison GridBased on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Comparison Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed. Health Legislation AnalysisIdentify the proponents/opponents of the bill.Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy StatementBased on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples. Health Legislation Analysis*** Please refer to rubric. Template is provided. APA format. Please incorporate these resources:https://www.congress.govhttps://www.house.govhttp://www.senate.gov/senators/leadership.htm rubric_detail_____blackboard_learn.pdflegislation_caprison_grid_template.docdiscussion.docxUnformatted Attachment PreviewHealth Legislation Analysis. Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: NURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric Grid View EXIT List View Federal and State Legislation Part 1: Legislation Comparison Grid Based on the healthrelated bill you selected, complete the Legislation Comparison Grid Template. Be sure to address the following: • Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed. • Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill. • Identify the target populations addressed by the bill. • Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees? Advocating for Legislation Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement Based on the healthrelated bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following: • Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position. • Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be speci!c and provide examples. Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, “ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Excellent Good Fair Poor 32 (32%) – 35 (35%) 28 (28%) – 31 (31%) 25 (25%) – 27 (27%) 0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The response clearly and accurately summarizes in detail the legislative intent of the health-related bill. The response accurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. The response vaguely or inaccurately summarizes the legislative intent of the health-related bill. Summary of the legislative intent of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. The response accurately identi!es in detail the proponents and opponents of the healthrelated bill. The response accurately identi!es the proponents and opponents of the health-related bill. The response vaguely or inaccurately identi!es the proponents and opponents of the healthrelated bill. Identi!cation of the proponents and opponents of the healthrelated bill are vague and inaccurate or is missing. The response vaguely or inaccurately identi!es the populations targeted by the health-related bill. Identi!cation of the populations targeted by the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. The response accurately identi!es in detail the populations targeted by the health-related bill. The response clearly and thoroughly describes in detail the current status of the health-related bill. The response accurately identi!es the populations targeted by the healthrelated bill. NURS 6050 Walden University Week 4 Health Legislation AnalysisHealth Legislation Analysis. The response accurately describes the current status of the health-related bill. The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the current status of the health-related bill. The description of the current status of the health-related bill is vague and inaccurate or is missing. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%) 40 (40%) – 44 (44%) 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) 0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Testimony clearly and thoroughly provides statements that fully justi!es a position for a health-related bill. Testimony clearly and accurately provides statements that somewhat justi!es a position for a health-related bill. Testimony used to justify a position for a healthrelated bill is vague or inaccurate. Testimony used to justify a position for a healthrelated bill is vague and inaccurate, incomplete, or is missing. Response provides a detailed, thorough, and logical explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the healthrelated bill and includes one or more clear and accurate supporting examples. Response provides an accurate explanation of how to address opponents to the position for the health-related bill and may include at least one supporting example. Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the healthrelated bill is vague or inaccurate, lacks logic, and/or the supporting examples are vague or inaccurate. Explanation of how to address the opponents to the position for the healthrelated bill is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources is provided, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided. An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course speci!c resources that may support the responses provided. A vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity. Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for “ow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. A complete, detailed, and speci!c synthesis of two outside resources is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course speci!c resources that fully supports the responses provided. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or o# topic. The recommendation of an amendment to the bill in support of the position is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. NURS 6050 Walden University Week 4 Health Legislation AnalysisHealth Legislation Analysis. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric EXIT Legislation Comparison Grid Template Legislation Comparison Grid Template Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement Health-related Bill Name Bill Number Description Federal or State? Legislative Intent Proponents/ Opponents Proponents: Opponents: Target Population Status of the bill (Is it in hearings or committees?) General Notes/Comments © 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 1 Running head: POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACA REPEAL Political Consequences of ACA Repeal Student name Institutional Affiliation Date 1 POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACA REPEAL Introduction The legislature plays an essential role in the sustenance of democracy in the US as the elected people represent their electorate’s interests. Democracy is conceptualized as a citizendriven governance system. Legislators play a vital role in developing policies that promote the best interests of the voters. An important caveat in understanding the role of legislators in policymaking is that they are politicians, and consequently, their primary concern is to increase their chances of being re-elected. The nearer the election period gets, the more legislators align their positions on pertinent issues to strengthen their re-election bids. This paper discusses the impact of the impending electioneering period on legislators’ approach to the subject of repealing or replacing the Affordable care Act. Challenges Hindering the ACA’s Repeal The Trump administration came into power promising to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare (Quadagno & Lanford, 2019). However, the going has been much more challenging than anticipated as the GOP has struggled to find a practical solution to replace the Act. The main appeal of Obamacare has been its successful integration of millions of Americans into the healthcare system. People who would have otherwise been uninsured have been incorporated into the health coverage framework embodied by Medicare and Medicaid (Isola & Reddivari, 2020). Therefore, the administration has found it difficult to replace the ACA without tearing down much of the healthcare system and has faced sustained opposition (Himes, 2017). How Re-election Bids Impact Efforts to Repeal the ACA 2 POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACA REPEAL 3 The uncertainty marring the ACA’s future embodies a cost-benefit analysis as it pits the legislator’s political inclination vis-à-vis the impact of his or her position on re-election chances. NURS 6050 Walden University Week 4 Health Legislation AnalysisORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERSEvery legislative choice has political consequences that boil down to securing another term in office or being ousted by displeased voters. Democrats and other legislators who support Obamacare have grown more vocal in supporting the health framework and castigation of the Trump government’s efforts to repeal the ACA (Miller, 2019). These legislators have been keen to highlight the adverse consequences of repealing the ACA as it would render many Americans vulnerable by increasing healthcare costs (AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 52, 2019). Given the high political stakes involved, the legislators who oppose the ACA’s implementation have expressed support for a repeal and delay approach to ensure that the anticipated action does not trigger a political backlash from supporters (Bryan, 2016). Voters’ Analysis Voters are bound to respond negatively when the policies advanced by legislators harms them. Voters’ analysis will not be based on the legislators’ intentions but the perceived outcome of their policy position. Given the intricacies of changing the healthcare system, legislators who support the ACA are bound to reiterate their stance to resonate with most voters’ concerns and improve their re-election chances. On the other hand, the people who oppose the Affordable care Act are likely to take a more pragmatic approach because pushing for rapid changes on the eve of elections may be disastrous for their re-election bids. Conclusion Healthcare is a sensitive issue to the electorate, and it influences their decisions at the ballot. Legislators have to find the correct balance in judgment to ensure that their policy POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACA REPEAL 4 positions do not cost them their jobs. As the paper aptly summarizes, a legislator’s primary consideration is securing his or her career by ensuring that their policy positions do not harm the electorate and the stakes are higher as the elections come closer. POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ACA REPEAL 5 References AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 165, No. 52 (2019/03/26). (2019, March 26). [Legislation]. CONGRESS.GOV. https://www.congress.gov/congressionalrecord/2019/3/26/senate-section/article/s2000-6 Bryan, B. (2016, December 29). The GOP might not repeal Obamacare until after the 2020 election. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-possibly-delayobamacare-repeal-until-after-2020-election-2016-12 Himes, J. (2017, January 13). House Moves to Repeal Affordable Care Act. CONGRESSMAN JIM HIMES. https://himes.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/house-moves-repealaffordable-care-act Isola, S., & Reddivari, A. K. R. (2020). Affordable Care Act (ACA). In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549767/ Miller, J. H. (2019). Collaborative Leadership in Senate Democrats’ Opposition to Affordable Care Act Repeal Efforts. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 9. Quadagno, J., & Lanford, D. (2019). The Obama health care legacy: The origins, implementation, and effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act of 2010. In Looking Back on President Barack Obama’s Legacy (pp. 69–92). Springer. …Purchase answer to see full attachmentStudent has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool’s honor code & terms of service. Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10 Order NowjQuery(document).ready(function($) { $.post('https://nursingpaperessays.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', {action: 'wpt_view_count', id: '11944'});});jQuery(document).ready(function($) { $.post('https://nursingpaperessays.com/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php', {action: 'mts_view_count', id: '11944'});});

Hire a competent writer to help you with

Health Legislation Analysis

troublesome homework